Showing posts with label oscars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oscars. Show all posts

Sunday, February 27

Exit Through the Gift Shop

by Mike Kamrowski 

"I don't think Terry played by the rules, in some ways. But then, there aren't supposed to be any rules..." -Banksy

As the 83rd Annual Academy Awards closes in on the world of cinema, there has been a lot of talk about a select few films. Black Swan, 127 Hours and True Grit are just some of the big names around the water cooler, but a film that most movie-goers probably missed, a documentary directed by a certain secretive street-artist, is gaining a lot of buzz... and that's not a bad thing. Hell, it's not even surprising.

I'll admit, the only reason I watched this movie was because I happened upon it one drunken evening of Netflix browsing and the title caught my attention. When I read the description, I couldn't have been more excited.

The flick I'm talking about is Exit Through the Gift Shop, a strange documentary/almost bio-pic about the even stranger world of street-art. Directed by renowned British street-artist/graffiti artist/political activist Banksy, this documentary focuses on the world of street-art and the individuals that helped bring it to the world's attention (as if it wasn't noticable enough already) by way of their amazing work. The man in question is a major focus in the film, with other famous artists (Shepard Fairey and Space Invader, among countless others) supplying the supporting cast.

Banksy and Gift Shop have been getting a lot of media attention in the past few weeks, primarily from his recent string of work in the LA area leading up to the Academy Awards and the "controversial" decision by the Awards show heads to ban Banksy from accepting the Best Documentary Award (should he win) in any from of disguise. For a guy who has lived in the spotlight but never revealed his true identity, this could cause a problem. *Academy president Tom Shreak has since changed his mind on the Banksy ban, but still... *

It's tough to not be a fan of Banksy's artwork. From his sculptures to his prints and everything in between (and there's a lot in that "in between" void), each is interesting in its own right. Everyone can take away a different interpertation from looking at his work (although most have a pretty straight forward message), even if it's just "Wow... that's pretty fucking cool."

The documentary, while about Banksy and his counterparts, is mainly the story of a man named Thierry Guetta. Thierry, a one time clothing dealer turned amateur videographer, comes off as a strange French hanger-on (we'll get to this in a bit)... or maybe he's just overly curious?

Thierry is introduced to the invention of the video camera and becomes completely obsessive with it (like a celebrity stalker), recording every instance in his life. Literally. We see later in the film just how much he filmed when he reveals his countless boxes filled with old tapes of random (and sometimes not so random and actually useful) shit.

Thierry and his lens became involved in the world of street-art after a chance encounter with his cousin (?), an infamous street-artist known as Space Invader. Through Invader, Thierry was introduced to the rising graffiti/street-art scene and never looked back- filming these individuals and their work became his life.

While many of the artists were skeptical of Thierry at first (what these guys were doing wasn't exactly legal), they grew to accept him in their elite circle; his claims of wanting to make a documentary about street-art helped seal this acceptance. Kind of...

If this was a Hollywood movie, Thierry would playing the role of the bumbling sidekick who can never seem to do anything right. He doesn't really understand the idea of being incognito (example: he turns his camera light on at night... while he's with the graffiti artists... who are defacing public property...), he's out of shape and can't really keep up with his younger counterparts, he ALWAYS HAS HIS CAMERA ON. A good one-word definition of this early Thierry character would be "relentless".

All that aside, he seems like a genuinely good guy who would do anything to help a street-artist out, especially if it meant he might get the chance to meet and film the elusive Banksy, which he eventually does thanks to Fairey.

Banksy and Thierry hook up and start a strange friendship, almost too weird to be fake (I only say this because there has been a lot of talk that the documentary is fake/the documentary is a prank by Banksy to move into the realm of cinema/Thierry is actually Banksy/the documentary is a big "fuck you" to up-tight art critics and dealers, the list goes on- if you want more theories, hit up Googs).

I don't want to get into too much more about the plot, but I will say this: the film does a complete 180 about three-fourths of the way through. The end of the film focuses mostly on Thierry and how he wants his own fame in the community he loves so dear. The beginning of the movie is innocent enough, but the last thirty or so minutes shows different intentions by the maker. After Banksy's wildly popular Barely Legal LA show and Thierry shows him the first disastrous cut of his "street-art documentary" that everyone had been hassling him about (were talking over a decade of this guy filming street-art with nothing to show for it), Banksy tells Thierry to take a break from filming and go and make his own art.

Banksy, who says he used to encourage everyone he met to make art, sings a different tune at the end of the film. "I don't really do that so much anymore," the elusive artist explains.

Thierry basically goes ape-shit, decides to run with Banksy's suggestion and make art, take it one step further and host his own art show (a la Barely Legal) and ceaselessly promote himself at all costs. He ends up making a fortune and his alter-ego, Mr. Brainwash, becomes a dominant name in the world of street-art (despite the fact that I've never even heard of it until I watched this movie two weeks ago).

The flicks tag-line The incredible true story of how the world's greatest Street Art movie was never made... is pretty spot on once you watch the entire film.

I think this film tried to say that street-art has garnered a mainstream label, so some think that this film, while showing how incredible and thought provoking street-art can be, is a satire on the entire "street-art in pop culture" movement. Thierry shows how processed and meaningless street-art can be with his "assembly-line" studio and horde of minions pumping out his insane ideas in the form of screen prints and sculptures. Interesting enough, we never actually see Thierry create any art- he spray paints "Life is Beautiful" on a brick wall to end the film, but that's it. I guess it can be argued that his years of intensely filming everything was art, and he did paste some giant stencils of himself around LA, but let's be honest here- he didn't fucking do anything.

Thierry literally learned from the best and when he decided to take off and make his own "street-art", as "commercial" as it is, he didn't have to do much except copy and paste. His years of following famous street-artists around made him yearn for the lime-light, and his desire for fame really showed when he put on his first show. I can see why some of his former friends "have beef" with him.

I think this film was so captivating and entertaining for a few reasons. 1.) Fuckin Banksy made it. It's going to be awesome if it has the B-mans stamp of approval. 2.) It showed how, I don't know, corrupted Thierry became by his venture? He started off curious and naive and ended a money hungry attention whore. Definitely a nice rise and fall story. 3.) The film showed the "behind the scenes" world of graffiti and street-art, something most people have no idea about. Banksy or not, this would have been a pretty cool flick.

My suggestion is, if you haven't had the chance to watch this thing yet, get it on that as soon as possible- you won't be disappointed. If you don't plan on seeing it, don't worry. Banksy will make sure you do.

Thursday, February 17

Potpourri: Steve Plays a Game Against Himself

So my last semester has started and of course, it's been non-stop work (ok, kind of a lie, I have showered once or twice). And poor Mike started a new job so he hasn't had time to do much reviewing anyhow.

But if I'm being honest with you all, January and February aren't normally stellar months for movies, with the exception of limited distribution Oscar nom's that finally go wide. Seriously, look up the numbers... the highest rated film on RottenTomatoes.com with wide distribution this year was Justin Bieber: Never Say Never with a 68%. I'm not kidding (though I did hear it was actually pretty good...), click the link and scroll to the bottom. It's also shows some real winners, like Season of the Witch (4%) and The Roommate (6%), a rating so low it would actually be admirable of you if you could find someone who liked those films.

My original plan for this post was to steal this idea from an article MSN posted about "should" and "will" win at the Oscar's, which was pretty well done until I realized they were basically just kissing The Social Network's ass. Now, as you all know, we've already had our 2010 Film Awards, which are clearly more important and accurate than the Oscars.

So instead, I'm gonna look ahead to the coming weeks and see if there is anything worth getting out into the snow to see. Usually January and February don't entice me too much, but things kick up in March. Let's see how long I can stay out of the theater.

(NOTE: I'll only be looking at wide releases, I could talk about limited's all day but I've got things to do.)

Ok, starting with tomorrow (February 18), we have I Am Number Four, Unknown, and Big Mommas House: Like Father Like Son.

I don't even know what to say, I can't commit or repute the first two, but the trailers are less than stellar. And the third, well, Martin Lawrence has officially joined Eddie Murphy in my book.

(Though I did get a laugh out of this, early screenings from RottenTomatoes have posted a 0% rating, which is unheard of and means Season of the Witch is 4x better than this movie... Wow.)

Moving on...

February 23 we've got Hall Pass and Drive Angry.

Hall Pass might be funny, but odds are it'll fall short of my minor expectations. As for Drive Angry... it's revenge movie (so usually pretty good... see Taken), but it's also a Nicholas Cage movie... so how the hell should I know! For every Raising Arizona, he's got a Wicker Man. Leaving Las Vegas, Season of the Witch. National Treasure, National Treasure 2. It's a crap shoot there.

Into March, we've got Rango and the Adjustment Bureau.

Like I said, in March things start to pick up and some decent movies come around. Rango has some appeal, especially since animated films have been trending toward more adult audiences (thanks to Pixar), and this one might be the most adult of all. As for the Adjustment Bureau, Damon's got cred in my book so I'd consider seeing it just because of him, but it might be too much paranoia for me, a la Enemy of the State ten years later.

So, still nothing gonna drag me outta the house. How bout March 11th?

Red Riding Hood, Battle: Los Angeles, and Mars Needs Mom's.

Mars Needs Mom's might be something I'd see if I had kids, but I don't. And I can't stand Seth Green outside of being Scott Evil. Pass.

Red Riding Hood intrigues me, but only so much as many horror movies have in recent memory, only to let me down. Catherine Hardwicke directed Twilight... I'm not going to be fooled this time.

Now, Battle: Los Angeles has more cred then many people think I would give it. Aaron Eckhart isn't quite at Damon's cred level, but I have respect for the man to not take part in a generically shitty film. At first glance, I'd say it could be this generation's Independence Day... but upon further review, it's directed by Jonathan Liebesman, the genius behind the Texas Chainsaw Massacre prequel and Darkness Falls... Eckhart, it would've never worked between us anyhow.

Ugh, it's getting stuffy in here... I've been cooped up since True Grit was release! Someone help me!

Okay, moving on. March 18 we've got Paul, Limitless, and The Lincoln Lawyer.

Limitless seems that it will be part of a pattern. Take a hot new actor (Bradley Cooper, and hot in marketability not physically, though who can resist that smile...) and pair him with an older but still well-known actor (Robert DeNiro) and watch the magic happen! Not so much, I'd definitely have to hear good things before I went out for this one.

The Lincoln Lawyer is a Matthew McConaughey film.

And finally we have Paul, which I hadn't heard a thing about until now. Simon Pegg and crew teaming with Seth Rogen and Jason Bateman? Yes please! Though, after reviewing the trailer, I do think it lacks some depth and might be just a movie made to get a bunch of fun actors together and dick around (a la Strange Wilderness, Couples Retreat)

Well, one week left...

March 25, we have The Beaver, Sucker Punch, and Diary of a Wimpy Kid 2

Technically the Beaver comes out March 23, but nevertheless it's a film directed by Jodie Foster starring Mel Gibson. (I'm laughing a little inside and it's getting hard to suppress it) I'm sorry for laughing, it's just poor Mel... Poor anti-semetic Mel...

Now Sucker Punch would be something I'd get out to see, Zach Snyder's wow'd before with 300 and Dawn of the Dead, but rumors are that early test screenings said the film were not so hot. And I might not yet be over the bland and snore-filled Watchmen.

As for Diary of a Wimpy Kid, I heard the first was pretty good, and most of the cast and crew should be returning (I'm not sure, at this point I got to lazy to look anything else up). So maybe if I get forced into watching the first one I might make it out for this... The forecast is doubtful though.

Doubtful until the snow melts.

Thursday, January 20

From the Peanut Gallery

By Steve Kochems

Hey, welcome to the first edition of From the Peanut Gallery, my horribly cliche'd title for what is basically my commentary on an issue. To be honest, I've really gotta be drawn out by something to do this, but recently I was. I missed, for the 68th consecutive year, this years edition of the Golden Globes... and didn't really regret it one bit until I heard how outrageous Ricky Gervais was. And now, I've officially finally been made to care about the Golden Globes.

First let me say that clearly nobody learned what happens when you cast a real, honest comic as the host of what should be an easy evening for someone powerful and how wrong it can go. Just to be sure, I re-watched clips from Gervais' hosting duties the previous year, where he teetered the fence of offensive and seemed borderline drunk. So the Hollywood Foreign Press Association had to know what they were getting into.

Most of the stars had to know to some extent what could happen with Gervais up there- he's one of the few comics who doesn't need the approval of Hollywood to make money or be successful. He's widely popular in the UK and Hollywood can't change that. But what irks me most is how sensitive everyone seems about his comments. Sure, his comments about Robert Downey Jr. were just about worthy of a beat down, but he's a comic. Does anyone honestly think that if Louis CK got up there he'd be any more merciful? Hollywood today is littered with jokes waiting to be told. Hell, he didn't even make one Lohan crack either!

(Note: Surprised she wasn't nominated for something... yes, I know she wasn't in anything to be nominated, but the morons who thought The Tourist was worthy but True Grit wasn't should be criticized for breathing in poor patterns if you ask me).

My point here is that they knew what they were getting into and got the worst of it. Gervais will never host (or be allowed/nominated) there again. But can anyone out there really tell me that if thirty or forty years ago they let Richard Pryor or Rodney Dangerfield host it would've been any different? Or George Carlin? I guess what I'm getting at is that comics today are totally different and true ones are few and far between. Steve Carell is not a comic, Ashton Kutcher is not a comic (or much of an actor)- Ricky Gervais is. Comedic actors need Hollywood to thrive, good comics don't. And the ones that think they do (See: Dane Cook, Lewis Black (upsetting), Zach Galfanakis) are often shoehorned into terrible movies that are only made to bring in people from that persons fan base, who are then in turn usually disappointed (The Hangover is an exception) because the script, director, and supporting cast sucks.

The bottom line is that while I agree Gervais crossed some lines and would've pissed me off had I been a target, nobody seemed to see it coming when it was all obviously laid out before them. Does any of it really matter though? Seriously, who looks at two movies and says "well, this one was nominated for a Golden Globe!" and that's the deciding factor? I hate most major award shows because they are usually very corporate and often rigged.

(Note: I did have one person in the business who supposedly has a friend who transported 2009's Oscar winners to the show, which included best Actor Mickey Rouke, not Sean Penn, whose speech was so well timed for the upcoming Gay Rights Vote in California)

(Extra Note: I'm not against Gay Rights, just Sean Penn)

(Additional Note: I'm kidding, I'd totally do a movie with Sean Penn)

So to sum this up, I'll use an age old saying... Who cares? It's the Golden Globes! I don't care, I doubt Mike cares, my girlfriend doesn't care, and I don't think Obama cares- that's as big as my list gets. I don't even have interest in them, I'll at least look at the Oscar winners just to see how far off the Academy is from the obviously correct opinion that I have. So good for you Ricky Gervais, with this blacklisting from Hollywood, at least you'll never have to make anything as bad as "The Invention of Lying" again.

Monday, January 10

Best Film Award of 2010

by Steve Kochems 

Hey kids, it’s that moment you’ve all been waiting for… (no not Christmas, that was weeks ago) at the bottom of this post is the first winner of the Kamo and Kochems Best Film Award! But before we get to that, I’d just like to give a quick tid-bit as to why I think each film has a shot at being the best of the year.

The Fighter
While it’s not an entirely fresh story (very few sports ones are), the cast drives this one. The quiet and tolerant Mickey, a confident and cock-sure crack addicted Dicky, and the hard-shelled Bostonian of a bartender Charlene are what keep this film fresh and interesting till the final punch. 

Inception
The concept alone is so original and inventive that it stands out further than any film in the last decade. In an era where 80% of Hollywood films are sequels/prequels, remakes, or from a previous source text, Inception is a landmark of creativity.

Toy Story 3 
Aesthetics alone can drive this film I’ve never felt so strongly involved in a narrative like I did in this film. Many will say it’s got the unfair advantage of two previous films to build it up, I would also argue that it’s got those two films to live up to, and Pixar manages to shatter the expectations that seem to go up for them every year.

Black Swan
An intense exploration into a young girl becoming a woman, Darren Aronofsky dazzles us with a dark and sexually violent film that has numerous thematic threads working beneath such a simple plot (not an easy thing to do with a ballet movie). 

True Grit
In a genre that has been so explored in cinema, only the Coen’s could come out with something as good as True Grit. While it’s the simplest of the two brother’s films to date, it’s probably the best-rounded movie of the year and will only get better with more viewings.

Now, before we announce the winner, I’d like to take the time to thank our eight critics who helped vote- Mike and I cannot say enough about how much we appreciate your input. Below you can see the votes for the Best Film category we received last week- we feel it’s worth noting how broad they were and that really shows just how diverse our critics were. Again, we thank you. 

Received Six Votes:
Toy Story 3 

Received Five Votes:
True Grit
The Fighter
Inception 

Received Four Votes:
Black Swan 

Received Three Votes:
(none)


Received Two Votes:
Despicable Me
The Town
How to Train Your Dragon
Shutter Island


Received One Vote:
127 Hours
Kick Ass
Repo Men
Tangled
The Expendables
Scott Pilgrim vs. the World
Machete
The Kids are Alright
Red
The Tillman Story
Prince of Persia: Sands of Time
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1
Burlesque

So, with these things aside, we’ve punched our esteemed voters grades into our high tech calculating machine and we’ve got our winner. It’s interesting to note though that all five of these films received an average score of 88 or above and were within 5 points of each other. In fact, the winning margin was 0.05 points!

The winner of the Kamo and Kochems 2010 Best Film Award is…

                                True Grit

All in all, I think True Grit won because the Coen Brothers can write a script and shoot a movie unlike anyone else in the world. It had an all-star cast and such likable characters who all still must pay the price to prove themselves, to prove their grit. It’s also the film that will hold up to repeat viewings the best of the five films in the finals. I’ve already saved a spot on my shelf for the DVD case and am proud that our first Best Film Award went to this film (though I’m hoping next year is much easier!).

Here’s to 2010 and bring in 2011!